Antoine Pitrou added the comment: AFAIR the Windows clock has a 15ms granularity, so I'm not really surprised. In other words, I don't think `asyncio.sleep` sleeps less than expected, but that it's the imprecision of time.time() which gives you that impression.
What happens if you replace `time.time()` with `time.perf_counter()` in the code above? ---------- nosy: +pitrou _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue31539> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
