Éric Araujo added the comment: Martin Panter
> I’m a bit confused. In the current patch, the new type_str() function > appears to use the “qualname” (which I support), but some of the test > changes seem to contradict this, e.g.: > >>> C.foo(1) > -classmethod <class 'test.test_descrtut.C'> 1 > +classmethod C 1 C is a qualname, as would be C.NestedD or something.<locals>.NestedD The qualname PEP explains why the module is not part of the qualname. Me > Finally, I don’t remember why I changed functions and modules when the two > original use cases were only for classes. The reason is a message by Nick on python-ideas. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue13224> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
