Cheryl Sabella added the comment:
Reviewing this patch, it appears that the PEP8 changes to timeit.py are already
in the source and the discussion of the thousands separator is no longer an
issue with the underscore changes in 3.6 (meaning underscore now seems the way
to separate digits in large numbers, although it seems the vote was to remove
all separators from timeit anyway).
That would leave the `loops per second` request the only one still needed from
this patch. But, with the subsequent change of selecting the time unit in
timeit, perhaps this patch would need to be modified to print 'loops per
{timeunit}'?
----------
nosy: +csabella
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue18975>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
