Antoine Pitrou added the comment: Oh and:
Le 18/08/2017 à 23:26, Guido van Rossum a écrit : > > I can't say I understand all of Antoine's patch, but it's probably okay to do > it this way; however I would rather see if we can add _is_owned() to Lock, > assuming it can be implemented using any of the threading/locking libraries > we still support (I presume that's basically posix and Windows). Regular Locks don't have the notion of an owning thread so, while we could add it, that would be a bizarre API. We can also detect reentrancy in get() and raise an error. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue14976> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
