Steven D'Aprano added the comment: > > Perhaps the check needs to be limited to just the exact type. > Looks reasonable to me. Do you want to provide a PR Martijn?
You realise that is making the current traceback *less* informative instead of more informative? I think that's going backwards -- useful information about the syntax errors are being discarded. "Practicality beats purity" -- the current behaviour is helpful, even if it mixes information about two errors into one traceback. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue31161> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
