gd2shoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: This is just common sense. I'm trying to avoid a poll() busy-wait section of code. I'll figure it out, but it would be much, much easier if wait accepted a number of seconds, and returned None if the process was still going (cf. Popen.poll() ).
I'm much happier with subprocess than os.popen*. I'm also glad that Popen.kill() is slated for 3.0 . Since this isn't in the 3.0b3 documentation, I assume this either isn't fixed or planned? Are there implementation difficulties? ---------- nosy: +gd2shoe _______________________________________ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue1396825> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
