Tiago Filipe Silva added the comment: Sorry for the late reply. I had to deal with stuff.
serhiy.storchaka: > What tools did you use, optipng, advpng, pngcrush, pngnq, pngquant, or other? > How much space is saved? I had half a crate of whiskey that day so I'm going to say optipng and pngcrush were used and if my recollection is good the saved space was ≈ 5 to 50 % depending on the file. > Note that some tools remove an information about palette that makes files > displaying differently on different platforms and output devises. I am aware of that. But if I understood correctly these files are rendered in documentation, and I don't think they're going to do this in a PlayStation 2. There may be complaints with Windows XP users because I remember for sure that optimized PNG files could not render very well back in those days. haypo: > I suggest to work on Sphinx to propose to implement this optimization on the > HTML rendering, maybe with optional external tools. What do you think? Like you I'm very fond of a long-term proper solution and that is, by the way, the solution you deserve. Unfortunately, I do not have the skills for provide that. I can only give the solution you need (which is smaller files). ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue30660> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
