Jesse Noller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: > > is_alive appears to be a potentially expensive check for the > multiprocessing side of things, which is why I'm inclined to leave it as > a method. "if t.is_alive():" actually reads better to me than "if > t.alive:" anyway.
Dang, I already cut that one over. _______________________________________ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue3352> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
