Charles-François Natali added the comment: > I don't think that selector.modify() can be a bottleneck, but IMHO the change > is simple and safe enough to be worth it. In a network server with 10k > client, an optimization making .modify() 1.52x faster is welcomed.
IMHO it complicates the code for little benefit: that's why I asked for a realistic benchmark. This patch could made modify() 10x faster, if modify() only accounts for 1% of the overall overhead in a realistic use-case, then it's not worth it. ---------- title: Speedup DefaultSelectors.modify() by 1.5x -> Speedup DefaultSelectors.modify() by 2x _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue30014> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
