Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Good catch!
This looks pretty simple to fix; I think a type check is missing (actually several, there are at least two implementations in io.py). In fact, the 2.6 version of io.py already has the necessary checks. (But merging those forward is not 100% trivial since in 3.0 the 'long' type doesn't exist.) ---------- keywords: +easy nosy: +gvanrossum _______________________________________ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue3521> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
