Jim Fasarakis-Hilliard added the comment: I believe the docs defined that, usually using a bold "CPython implementation detail" sentence.
It seems like it's something that would be considered an implementation detail, though, according to Raymond's answer here: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/32720492/why-is-a-class-dict-a-mappingproxy Changing it to just state it's a mapping definitely looks like the safest option. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue29251> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
