A.M. Kuchling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: I agree; we don't want to require people to read the 2.6 document, and then the 3.0 document to get a complete picture.
Besides, the organization of the 2.x documents may not be suitable for the 3.0 document. The 2.x documents are organized by PEP, then a section for miscellaneous language changes, then a section for library changes. For 3.0, you probably want to do all language changes in one section, ignoring how they were broken up into PEPs, then a section on the library reorganization, and then maybe sections on using 2to3 or porting C extensions. It's certainly OK with me to copy text from the 2.6 document into the 3.0 one, if some of the text is useful. _______________________________________ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue2305> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
