Oren Milman added the comment: i played a little with a patch earlier today, but stopped because I am short on time.
anyway, just in case my code is not totally rubbish, I attach my patch draft, which should avoid OverflowError also for big positive ints. (of course, I don't suggest to use my code instead of PR 680. I just put it here in case it might be useful for someone.) (on my Windows 10, it passed some manual tests by me, and the test module (except for test_venv, which fails also without the patch)) ---------- keywords: +patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file46727/patchDraft1.diff _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue29816> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com