Brett Cannon added the comment: Please keep this issue closed until you hear back from the SWIG team. Just because your code worked under Python 3.5 doesn't mean SWIG didn't accidentally emit something that breaks under Python 3.6 because we started being more stringent about something. Basically unless we have C code (and not SWIG or C++ code) to reproduce this then we have to go on the assumption it's a problem on SWIG's side.
---------- resolution: -> third party status: open -> closed _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue29758> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
