Martin v. Löwis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: I dislike this change, not because of the potential slowdown, but because of the added code complexity.
How plausible is it that you want to join a list of bytes objects, and the list has more than one item, yet all but one item are empty? If you have such an application, and performance matters, you shouldn't add the empty bytes to the list in the first place. Tentatively rejecting the patch. ---------- resolution: -> rejected status: open -> pending _______________________________________ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue3459> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
