Martin v. Löwis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: > Well, if that resolution is prefered, I think it should be integrated to > the builtin print function, rather than forcing users to monkeypatch it > (but a debugging facility directly calling sys.stdout.write or > equivalent will not be helped).
True. I think it is the stream's write method that must be synchronized, e.g. by renaming the current write function to _write_locked, and adding a write function that obtains a per-file lock, and calls write_locked. Other methods accessing the buffer need to get synchronized with the same lock as well. This is how it's done in about any stdio implementation I ever looked at. _______________________________________ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue3476> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
