Eric Lafontaine added the comment: oh, I've got what you meant!
Proposed change : For user-defined classes which define the __contains__() method, the in operator will convert to False "x in y" if y.__contains__(x) return False, 0 or None. Otherwise, the in operator will return True for any other value being returned by y.__contains__(x). Would that make more sense? Regards, Eric Lafontaine ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue16011> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
