Raymond Hettinger added the comment: I believe this is a safe change. All of the replaced pairs on consecutive lines so there are no intervening operations.
For Modules/xxsubtype.c, I think the code should remain as-is. It is intended to be the simplest possible example of how to make a subtype and its clarity is reduced by requiring that someone learn the macro. That said, it would be reasonable to add a comment that this pair could also have been coded as Py_RETURN_NONE (i.e. use it as a teachable moment). ---------- assignee: -> serhiy.storchaka nosy: +rhettinger _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue28999> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
