INADA Naoki added the comment: I don't think this is a regression, bug, bogos naming.
I agree that "<concurrent.futures.thread.ThreadPoolExecutor object at 0x7f96711ac278>_0" is ugly. But the name describes what is the thread, than "Thread-1". How about giving default thread_name_prefix less ugly? e.g. "ThreadPoolExecutor-worker". ---------- nosy: +inada.naoki _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue29212> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
