Erik Bray added the comment:

Thanks Masayuki for the updated patch, and especially for the additional test 
cases.

Looking at the patch, it occurs to me that this solution seems to be the 
minimal needed to fix the issue that we were originally trying to fix, without 
adding too much additional complexity or new semantics to how TLS keys are used 
in the interpreter.  In other words, this preserves the existing usage with 
minimal changes except to better support opaque key types.  So I think it's a 
point in favor of this change that's managed to remain focused.

I'll work on updating the PEP draft to reflect the additions.

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue25658>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to