Matt Giuca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Wow, I read the WSGI spec. That seems very strange that it says "HTTP
does not directly support Unicode, and neither does this interface."
Clearly HTTP *does* support Unicode, because it allows you to specify an
encoding.
I assume then that the ISO-8859-1 characters the WSGI functions receive
will be treated as byte values. (That's rather silly; it's just dodging
the issue of Unicode rather than supporting it).
But in any event, the PEP has spoken, so we stick with Latin-1.
With respect to the text/binary stream, I think it would be best if it's
a binary stream, and we explicitly convert those str objects (which WSGI
says must only contain Latin-1 range characters) into bytes objects
(simply treating code points as bytes; in other words calling
.encode('latin-1')) and writing them to the binary stream. (Since the
WSGI spec is so adamant we deal in bytes).
_______________________________________
Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue3348>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
