Nick Coghlan added the comment: Steve's patch LGTM, and I now agree our needs are simple enough that we can rely on subprocess+unittest for the result reporting.
I'd just missed Steve's simple solution of using the return code to indicate success or failure, as well as Eric's approach in issue 29102 of teaching the related Python test case to read the text output from the _testembed test case. If we eventually want to go beyond the single "run this test case" argument, then adding getopt() support to _testembed should be sufficient. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue24932> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
