Ammar Askar added the comment: I've attached two patches that fix this behavior, one by simply foregoing the fold detection for this time range on windows (the patch that I'd argue is simpler and more readable)
And one that truncates the passed values to local to not be negative. This one would have been simple but unfortunately there's the complication that there are two local calls and additionally, the second one cannot be truncated to exactly 0 because then we incorrectly detect a fold for the timestamp 0. ---------- keywords: +patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file46091/forego_fold_detection.patch _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue29097> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
