R. David Murray added the comment: The second patch seems to be missing the configure changes. Also, the tests have some over-long lines (we limit line lengths to 79 characters). I realize there are other long lines in that file, but no need to add more :)
There is trailing whitespace on a number of lines in your patch. Since this is new, we may not want to accept it until the support hits upstream. Specifically, it will be difficult to get a review if the reviewer has to build a custom kernel to test the code :) You do say that the VMCI is upstream, but I don't know what that means. Which upstream? Note: I'm not familiar with the socket C code, so I haven't reviewed the C code changes. The tests look fine to me. For the docs, the proposal doesn't seem to follow the format of the existing docs. I would expect only the first paragraph located where you have it. The remaining constants should be in the 'module contents'/'constants' section, I think. Yes, that means each one gets a '.. versionadded' label. Presumably also an 'availablility' label with whatever the minimum kernel version is...another reason we may need to wait. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue27584> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
