STINNER Victor added the comment: Result of performance 0.3.3 (and perf 0.8.3).
No major benchmark is faster. A few benchmarks seem to be event slower using fastint6.patch (but I don't really trust pybench). == fastint6.patch == $ python3 -m perf compare_to master.json fastint6.json --group-by-speed --min-speed=5 Slower (3): - pybench.ConcatUnicode: 52.7 ns +- 0.0 ns -> 56.1 ns +- 0.4 ns: 1.06x slower - pybench.ConcatStrings: 52.7 ns +- 0.3 ns -> 56.1 ns +- 0.1 ns: 1.06x slower - pybench.CompareInternedStrings: 16.5 ns +- 0.0 ns -> 17.4 ns +- 0.0 ns: 1.05x slower Faster (4): - pybench.SimpleIntFloatArithmetic: 441 ns +- 2 ns -> 400 ns +- 6 ns: 1.10x faster - pybench.SimpleIntegerArithmetic: 441 ns +- 2 ns -> 401 ns +- 5 ns: 1.10x faster - pybench.SimpleLongArithmetic: 643 ns +- 4 ns -> 608 ns +- 6 ns: 1.06x faster - genshi_text: 79.6 ms +- 0.5 ms -> 75.5 ms +- 0.8 ms: 1.05x faster Benchmark hidden because not significant (114): 2to3, call_method, (...) == inline2.patch == haypo@selma$ python3 -m perf compare_to master.json inline2.json --group-by-speed --min-speed=5 Faster (2): - spectral_norm: 223 ms +- 1 ms -> 209 ms +- 1 ms: 1.07x faster - pybench.SimpleLongArithmetic: 643 ns +- 4 ns -> 606 ns +- 7 ns: 1.06x faster Benchmark hidden because not significant (119): 2to3, call_method, (...) ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue21955> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
