Facundo Batista <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
If readability is enhanced is questionable, but is rejected on the basis
that cosmetic-only changes are not generally recommended: only
difficults following the code evolution in the repository.
The only change that I see regarding performance is the one involving
startswith, and it's actually wrong:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ timeit.py -s "s='qwerty'" "s[0]=='q';s[0]=='x'"
1000000 loops, best of 3: 0.338 usec per loop
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ timeit.py -s "s='qwerty'"
"s.startswith('q');s.startswith('x')"
1000000 loops, best of 3: 0.854 usec per loop
Thanks anyway!
----------
nosy: +facundobatista
resolution: -> rejected
status: open -> closed
_______________________________________
Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue3159>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
