Jack Liu added the comment: I know there is a workaround to set the global variables to None at last in Python scripts. But my app just provide a framework for my customers to run python scripts. That means the workaround requires my customers to update their python scripts. That may make them unhappy :(. First, we need to confirm if it's a bug of Python 3.5. If it's a bug of Python 3.5, is there a workaround in my code C++ side to call Python C APIs to resolve the memory leak issue? If it's not a bug of Python 3.5, is there any mistake in my C++ code?
---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue28202> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com