New submission from Jason Yu: Hello all,
The official doc describes `Pool.map(func, iterable[, chunksize])` as "A parallel equivalent of the map() built-in function.". Since the function signature of `map` is `map(function, iterable, ...)`, I hereby suggest that `Pool.map` should change its function signature to `Pool.map(function, iterable, ... [, chunksize])`. This will bring true equivalent to these functions. Tell me what you think. Pool.map: https://docs.python.org/3/library/multiprocessing.html#multiprocessing.pool.Pool.map map: https://docs.python.org/3/library/functions.html#map Jason ---------- components: Interpreter Core messages: 273741 nosy: Jason Yu priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: multiprocessing.pool.Pool.map should take more than one iterable type: enhancement versions: Python 3.6 _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue27873> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
