R. David Murray added the comment:

It seems perfectly logical and consistent to me.  {4} is a repeat count, as is 
*.  You get the same error if you do 'a?*', and the same bypass if you do 
'(a?)*' (though I haven't tested if that does anything useful :).  You don't 
need the ?:, as far as I can tell, you just need to have the * modifying a 
group, making the group the "preceding regular expression".

----------
nosy: +r.david.murray

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue27800>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to