R. David Murray added the comment: It seems perfectly logical and consistent to me. {4} is a repeat count, as is *. You get the same error if you do 'a?*', and the same bypass if you do '(a?)*' (though I haven't tested if that does anything useful :). You don't need the ?:, as far as I can tell, you just need to have the * modifying a group, making the group the "preceding regular expression".
---------- nosy: +r.david.murray _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue27800> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com