Antoine Pitrou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Le samedi 28 juin 2008 à 22:20 +0000, Guido van Rossum a écrit :
> Finally, is there a use case of re.LOCALE any more? I'm thinking not.
It's used for locale-specific case matching in the non-unicode case. But
it looks to me like a bad practice and we could probably remove it.
'C'
>>> re.match('À'.encode('latin1'), 'à'.encode('latin1'), re.IGNORECASE)
>>> re.match('À'.encode('latin1'), 'à'.encode('latin1'), re.IGNORECASE
>>> |re.LOCALE)
>>> locale.setlocale(locale.LC_CTYPE, 'fr_FR.ISO-8859-1')
'fr_FR.ISO-8859-1'
>>> re.match('À'.encode('latin1'), 'à'.encode('latin1'), re.IGNORECASE)
>>> re.match('À'.encode('latin1'), 'à'.encode('latin1'), re.IGNORECASE |
>>> re.LOCALE)
<_sre.SRE_Match object at 0xb7b9ac28>
_______________________________________
Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue2834>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
