Yury Selivanov added the comment:
> How about we use connect_socket() or a variant on that name? That feels
> similar to connect_{read,write}_pipe(), which also take a protocol_factory
> and an already-opened I/O object.
I like the idea to use "connect_" prefix here. How about simple
"connect_accepted_socket"?
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue27392>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
