Mark Dickinson added the comment: > People usually say it's because we don't have separate imaginary type, but we > don't need it.
I think we do. Consider the case of something like -0 + 1j (the `repr` of complex(-0.0, 1.0)). That currently evaluates to `complex(0.0, 1.0)`, because the `-0.0` is combined with the `+0.0` real part of `1j`. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue27363> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
