Mark Dickinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: The patch looks good to me.
It's a bit unfortunate that -0.0 doesn't round-trip correctly (the sign of the zero gets lost): >>> eval(bin(-0.0)) 0.0 I don't know whether it's worth special-casing this; the output would have to be in a different format: '-0b0 * 2.0 ** 0' isn't good enough, since unary minus has higher precedence than multiplication. ---------- nosy: +marketdickinson _______________________________________ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue3008> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
