Raymond Hettinger added the comment: > But I'll be happiest if nothing changes here (given that Guido ruled > yesterday that Python's current urandom() implementation has to be > reverted to once again match Linux's non-blocking urandom() behavior).
With urandom() behavior restored, can we close this? ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue27272> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
