STINNER Victor added the comment: > Not that it needs saying again, but I'm still in favour of doing something > like what Christian is suggesting, or like I suggested earlier (have > os.urandom remain good, have Python internally fall back to weaker seeds for > random and SipHash if it's run so early that the system hasn't started up > fully yet).
It looks like people don't read what I'm writing :-( You are just repeating the title of this issue :-) (So yes, I agree with you, since I'm proposing the same thing.) ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue27266> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com