STINNER Victor added the comment:

> Not that it needs saying again, but I'm still in favour of doing something 
> like what Christian is suggesting, or like I suggested earlier (have 
> os.urandom remain good, have Python internally fall back to weaker seeds for 
> random and SipHash if it's run so early that the system hasn't started up 
> fully yet).

It looks like people don't read what I'm writing :-( You are just
repeating the title of this issue :-) (So yes, I agree with you, since
I'm proposing the same thing.)

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue27266>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to