Emanuel Barry added the comment: Git diffs work, but this one doesn't apply cleanly. I manually fixed it and re-generated the patch. Rietveld should pick it up now.
Otherwise, what Jelle said. I'm not sure if the macro has the best name though - I'd probably name it `PyPartial_CheckExact` and reserve `PyPartial_Check` to allow checking for subclasses. Not sure if we need to add both in here, but it would be weird to have only one (even if the other is unused). (Also, depending which of this one or #27137 gets committed first, the other patch will need to be updated. I'll probably do it since the other is mine.) ---------- nosy: +ebarry stage: needs patch -> patch review versions: +Python 3.6 -Python 3.5 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file43206/partial_richcompare_1_regenerated.patch _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue21130> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
