Emanuel Barry added the comment: +1. I prefer that change, as using subclasses of `type` as if they were type itself never made sense to me. This shouldn't break existing code, but if it does, it was either a concealed bug or a very bad idea to begin with, and should be fixed either way.
Attached patch implements Eryk's suggestion. I haven't found any tests that checked for subclasses of type specifically (except tests testing for metaclass stuff), and I haven't added any either. ---------- keywords: +patch stage: -> needs patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file43054/type_one_argument_1.patch _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue27157> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
