Oren Milman added the comment: I agree. This assert only indirectly verifies that something bad doesn't happen.
The bad thing that might happen is an in-place negating of an element of small_ints, so the most direct assert should be 'assert(Py_REFCNT(z) == 1);'. This is exactly what Victor did in long_lshift back in revision 84698... What do you think? ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue27073> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
