Zachary Ware added the comment: I'm very much +1 on the patch.
A couple thoughts: - Note that 2.7 doesn't come with a launcher. - As I understand it, the 3.5+ installer won't overwrite a newer launcher than what it would install, but the 3.4- installer will. So the only really confusing (to my mind) thing that could happen would be someone installing 3.4 after 2.7 and 3.6, and the newly installed old 3.4 launcher reverts to defaulting to 2.x. There's not much we can do about that, though: there will be no more 3.3 or 3.4 installers, so an update to the launcher in those branches would never see the light of day anyway. I think this is an uncommon-enough situation that it can be ignored, but one possible way to work around it would be to install a pro-3 py.ini along with the launcher in 3.6+ (if it wouldn't be overwriting an existing py.ini). Probably more effort than it's worth, though. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue27064> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com