Mark Dickinson added the comment: > As I understand, the conclusion of the Python-Dev discussion is that __int__, > __float__, __complex__, etc should return exact int, float, complex, not > subclasses.
Agreed; that matches my understanding. I'm only observing that it would be difficult (and likely undesirable) to actually enforce that `__int__` itself always returns an exact int: I'm not sure where that check would/could take place, and I'd expect that a direct user-level call to `my_object.__int__` probably wouldn't be subject to such a check. What we *can* do is check that the result of the `nb_int` call is always an int in the places we use it. Or we could even go further, and write custom slot_nb_float and slot_nb_int functions in Objects/typeobject.c that incorporates those checks. What I don't think we can do is check that a *direct* call to `__int__` or `__float__` always returns something of the exact type. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue26983> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
