Josh Rosenberg added the comment: Seems sensible for itemgetter and attrgetter, where all but the first argument is nonsensical anyway.
It really seems like methodcaller should allow additional arguments (positional and keyword though), a la functools.partial (the difference being the support for duck-typed methods, where functools.partial only supports unbound methods for a specific type). I suppose #25454 disagrees, but it seems very strange how `methodcaller` is like `functools.partial`, but without call time argument binding, only definition time. ---------- nosy: +josh.r _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue26822> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
