Jeff Allen added the comment:

Here is a patch that improves coverage and addresses the uneven accuracy. 
Required accuracy is now specified in ulps. Mostly, I have choses 1 ulp, since 
this passed for me on an x86 architecture (and also ARM), but this may be too 
ambitious.

I have also responded to the comment relating to erfc:
    # XXX Would be better to weaken this test only
    # for large x, instead of for all x."

I found I could not contribute the code I used to generate the additional test 
cases in Tools/scripts without failing test_tools. (It complained of a missing 
dependency. The generator uses mpmath.)

----------
keywords: +patch
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file42166/iss26040.patch

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue26040>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to