Amaury Forgeot d'Arc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Let me quote a comment from GvR about the similar issue1185:
""" Can you redo the patch while keeping the slot *position* (though not the name or type)? The wasted space is minimal (4-8 bytes per type or class object) and it means a lot for third party code if the positional struct initialization never breaks due to insertion or removal of a slot. Since everyone has a zero here anyway, I propose to name the slot nb_reserved and make its type int. """ OTOH, it's python 3.0, and we are allowed to break things... ---------- nosy: +amaury.forgeotdarc _______________________________________ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue2997> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
