Terry J. Reedy added the comment: The TypeError is correct. You passed a non-iterable. I agree that adding information, *if possible*, when 'non-iterable' is determined by an exception being raised, would be nice. I don't know how easy this would be.
---------- nosy: +terry.reedy stage: -> test needed type: behavior -> enhancement versions: +Python 3.6 _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue26407> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
