Yury Selivanov added the comment: >> Unless there are any objections, I'll commit fastint5.patch in a day or two.
> Please don't. I would like to have time to benchmark all these patches (there > are now 9 patches attached to the issue :-)) and I would like to hear > Serhiy's feedback on your latest patches. Sure, I'd very appreciate a review of fastint5. I can save you sometime on benchmarking -- it's really about fastint_alt vs fastint5. The latter optimizes ALL ops on longs AND floats. The former only optimizes some ops on longs. So please be sure you're comparing oranges to oranges ;) ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue21955> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
