Ioan Fintescu added the comment: If you consider that, you should take a look at the RFC; it also contains a BNF like grammar plus some pointers to another RFC (2234). It may require more effort that it is worth, absent some demand for it.
...muss On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 9:34 AM, R. David Murray <rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote: > > R. David Murray added the comment: > > Oh, maybe there is. We could add an RFC-strict dialect that would raise > an error, if I'm understanding your quotes from it correctly. That would > be a new feature, though. > > ---------- > > _______________________________________ > Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> > <http://bugs.python.org/issue25857> > _______________________________________ > ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue25857> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
