Rafael Zanella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
I don't know a lot about the matter at hand, that's why I'm not gonna
append a patch.
On "_communicate()" after a pipe is read it's closed, doing the same on
"communicate()" seems to solve the issue of the extra pipe:
"""
if [self.stdin, self.stdout, self.stderr].count(None) >= 2:
stdout = None
stderr = None
if self.stdin:
if input:
self.stdin.write(input)
self.stdin.close()
elif self.stdout:
stdout = self.stdout.read()
+ self.stdout.close()
elif self.stderr:
stderr = self.stderr.read()
+ self.stderr.close()
self.wait()
return (stdout, stderr)
"""
Tested on "Python 2.6a2+ (trunk:62767M, May 19 2008, 13:11:07)".
----------
nosy: +zanella
__________________________________
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue2791>
__________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
