Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:

Proposals like this have been rejected in the past.  Memory consumption 
is an evasive concept.  Lists over-allocate space, there are freelists, 
there are immortal objects, the python memory allocator may hang-on to 
space thought to be available, the packing and alignment of structures 
varies across implementations, the system memory allocator may assign 
much larger chunks than are needed for a single object, and the memory 
may not be freed back to the system.  Because of these issues, it is 
not that meaningful to say the object x consumes y bytes.

----------
nosy: +rhettinger

__________________________________
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue2898>
__________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to