Mark Dickinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: > Test 11 failed: 9007199254740992.0 vs 9007199254740991.0 expected for > [9007199254740992.0, -0.5, -5.5511151231257827e-17].
Yes: that's the lack of correct rounding rearing its ugly head... > Test 12 failed: inf vs 1.7976931348623157e+308 expected for > [8.9884656743115785e+307, -1.0, 8.9884656743115795e+307]. I'm still trying to work out how to get around this one; again, the result's not out by much, but it would be nice to be able to guarantee correctly rounded answers *all* the time, instead of just *most* of the time. __________________________________ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue2819> __________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
