Mark Dickinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:

> Test 11 failed: 9007199254740992.0 vs 9007199254740991.0 expected for 
> [9007199254740992.0, -0.5, -5.5511151231257827e-17].
Yes: that's the lack of correct rounding rearing its ugly head...

> Test 12 failed: inf vs 1.7976931348623157e+308 expected for 
> [8.9884656743115785e+307, -1.0, 8.9884656743115795e+307].

I'm still trying to work out how to get around this one;  again, the
result's not out by much, but it would be nice to be able to guarantee 
correctly rounded answers *all* the time, instead of just *most* of the 
time.

__________________________________
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue2819>
__________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to