Martin Panter added the comment: Thanks for the test case. It looks like the commit in question was done as a security fix in 3.2.6 and 3.3.6. I’m not sure on the policy, but maybe that justifies putting any fixes into 3.2+.
I’m not familiar with HTTP cookies. Is this a case of a 100% specification-compiliant cookie, or a technically invalid one that would be nice to handle better? If the second case, maybe it is an instance of Issue 22983. ---------- keywords: +3.2regression nosy: +martin.panter stage: -> needs patch _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue25228> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
